A weather station tells you what fell on one point. What underwriting and lending actually need is how much water is sitting in the root zone and how fast the crop is using it, across every parcel in the book. We map soil moisture and evapotranspiration from orbit at parcel scale, on a repeating cycle, and deliver each value with a calibrated uncertainty band, so a drought-stress signal can drive pricing, payout triggers and irrigation decisions instead of just colouring in a map.
A parcel-scale soil-moisture and evapotranspiration layer with a calibrated prediction interval on every value, benchmarked against in-situ soil and flux stations. It turns the root-zone water balance into a number you can actually underwrite or finance against.
No single accuracy percentage is quoted below. The differentiator is a calibrated interval on every parcel value, benchmarked against independent soil and flux measurements.
Yes. Each parcel value arrives as a conformal prediction interval with guaranteed coverage, so the band an actuary loads into a model has a property that actually holds out of sample. Soil moisture and evapotranspiration are benchmarked against in-situ soil-moisture probes and flux (eddy-covariance) reference stations, and the gridded climate inputs feeding the indices get bias-checked against the national meteorological network before any downstream model ever sees them.
Spatial: mapped at parcel scale, with sub-parcel detail where the field is large enough relative to sensor resolution.
Temporal: refreshed on the satellite revisit cycle through the growing season — optical and thermal depend on clear sky, radar continues through cloud to keep the soil-moisture signal alive.
Tabular feeds map onto actuarial pricing and loan-scoring pipelines. Rasters import into farm-management and irrigation-planning platforms.
Three honest limits, three mitigations. (1) Cloud blocks optical and thermal sensing, so we maintain continuity with radar, which retrieves a surface-soil-moisture signal through cloud — and we state any residual gap rather than quietly interpolating over it. (2) Small and fragmented parcels fall near or below sensor resolution. Those get flagged and carry a wider interval, so the uncertainty is priced instead of ignored. (3) The root zone sits below what any sensor sees directly. Satellites observe the surface and the canopy, so root-zone water gets inferred from the surface signal plus the modelled water balance and crop water use, with the interval widening to reflect that inferred depth.
Where the signal runs thin, the band runs wide and visible. That's the whole policy — never a confident number hiding a caveat.
Outputs support parametric and indemnity agri-insurance design, CSRD-aligned water and climate disclosure for agribusiness, and an auditable basis for credit decisions. Processing runs under EU data residency.
We don't claim a regulatory product certification we don't hold, and we say so plainly. The layer feeds the actuarial, credit and reporting processes you already run.
The product delivers a near-real-time monitoring view of root-zone water and crop water use across the season, plus a short-range drought-stress outlook wherever soil moisture and weather inputs are well observed. Forward-looking values carry their own widening band, so a stress warning always comes paired with a quantified confidence instead of being presented as certainty.
| ATTRIBUTE | SOIL MOISTURE & ET · AGRONOMY INTELLIGENCE |
|---|---|
| Primary client | Agri-insurers, agri-finance, large farms and cooperatives |
| Spatial resolution | Parcel scale, with sub-parcel detail on larger fields |
| Update frequency | Satellite revisit cycle through the season; radar continues through cloud |
| Uncertainty | Calibrated prediction interval (conformal, guaranteed coverage) on every parcel value |
| Validation reference | In-situ soil-moisture probes and flux stations; met network for input climate fields |
| Delivery | API · GeoTIFF · vector parcel tables · PDF report · API & map layers |
| Integration | Actuarial / credit pipelines; farm-management and irrigation platforms |
| Horizon | Near-real-time monitoring plus short-range drought-stress outlook |
| Key limitation | Cloud, small parcels and root-zone depth — mitigated by radar, wider intervals and water-balance inference |
| Compliance relevance | Parametric / indemnity insurance design, CSRD-aligned disclosure; EU data residency |
This slot is reserved for a completed design-partner pilot. We don't publish a case study before the work exists — when one closes, it will carry the portfolio or farm context, the comparison against that client's own ground reference, and the realised interval coverage at parcel scale.
Residual tables against soil and flux reference, the interval-coverage protocol and the small-parcel flagging rules all ship under NDA with every pilot.
Start a pilot See how we validate